Article review

hello! this assignment is about article review i have sent the assignment description please follow that and prepare an article not less than 1500 words. choose any article that i have sent list of articles. please follow the task description from description file. 

MGMT20135: Marking Rubrics for Assessment 1: Practical and Written Assessment-Article Review

Section/Criteria 30% Fail (Less than
25%)

Fail (26-49%) Pass (50‐59%) Credit (60‐69%) Distinction (70‐79%) High

Distinction (80 ‐100%)

Introduction:

Clearly outlines the purpose, scope,
structure of the essay.

3

No introduction. No topic, key points
and/or purpose is
introduced or the
introduction is
irrelevant to
assessment item.

Topic introduced, but
the introduction is
underdeveloped in
terms of key points
and/or purpose

Topic, key points and
purpose of the essay is
introduced with
satisfactory clarity.

Topic, key points and
purpose of the essay
is introduced in a
clear and interesting
way.

Topic, key points and
purpose of the essay is
introduced in a clear
and interesting way.

Body—critical analysis
The following list of questions are effectively
addressed:

o What is the background of the
research?

o What is the research problem? What
do we know about the research
problem? What do we not know?

o What are the core research questions
the article addresses? Why are they
important to address?

o How was the research conducted?
o What where the major findings?
o What are the significance of the

findings for future research or
management practice?

10

Demonstrates little,
if any, knowledge
and understanding
of the chosen article
with extremely
limited, if any,
analysis. Might
attempt all
questions, but only
one (1) of them is
effectively
addressed.

Demonstrates limited
knowledge and
understanding of the
chosen article by
providing a limited
level of analysis.
Might attempt all
questions, but only
two (2) of them are
effectively addressed.

Demonstrate average
level of understanding
of the chosen article
by providing an
acceptable level of
analysis. Three (3) of
the attempted
questions are
effectively addressed.

Demonstrates a good
level of knowledge of
the chosen article by
providing some level of
analysis. Four (4) of the
attempted questions
are effectively
addressed.

Demonstrates a
balanced and high
level of knowledge
and understanding of
the chosen article by
providing a high level
of analysis.
Five (5) of the
attempted questions
are effectively
addressed.

Demonstrates a
balanced and very high
level of detailed
knowledge and
understanding of the
chosen article by
providing a very high
level of analysis. All the
six (6) questions are
effectively addressed,

Body—critical evaluation
The following list of questions are effectively
addressed:

o In your view, are there any limitations
with this research?

o What are some of the assumptions
that the authors have made in this
research? Do you agree with them?

o What is your overall evaluation of the
article’s effectiveness and credibility?

10 Demonstrates little,
if any, critical
thinking with
extremely limited, if
any, analysis. None
of the three
questions is
effectively
addressed.

Demonstrates limited
critical thinking by
providing a limited
level of analysis.
Might attempt all
questions, only one
(1) of them is
effectively addressed.

Demonstrate average
level of critical
thinking by providing
an acceptable level of
analysis. Two (2) of
the three questions
are effectively
addressed.

Demonstrates a good
level of critical thinking
by providing some level
of analysis with
evidence.
At least Two (2) of the
three questions are
effectively addressed.

Demonstrates a high
level of critical
thinking by providing
a high level of analysis
with evidence. All
three (3) questions
are effectively
addressed.

Demonstrates an
exceptional level of
critical thinking by
providing a high level of
analysis with strong and
compelling evidence. All
three (3) questions are
effectively addressed.

Conclusion:
All aspects drawn together in a brief, concise
summary. Consistent with findings, no new
material introduced but highlights
implications or a comment on the future of
the issue.

3

No conclusions
provided.

Brief conclusion but
no links established to
the introduction and
body of the essay.

Brief conclusion with
limited links
established to the
introduction and body
of the essay.

The conclusion
provided some links to
the introduction and
body, but was not
concise or unclear.

The conclusion
provided links to the
introduction and
body, but concise or
unclear at times.

Clear and concise
summary of the essay
with links to the
introduction and body
of the essay.

MGMT 20135: Marking Rubrics for Assessment 1: Practical and Written Assessment-Article Review

Presentation:

High quality of expression, grammar, spelling,
punctuation and proofreading.

2

Quality of writing is
at a very poor
standard so barely
understandable.
Many spelling
mistakes. Little or
no evidence of proof
reading.

Poor format, no
cover page and not
meeting the word
count requirement.

Some problems with
sentence structure
and presentation
Frequent grammar,
punctuation and
spelling mistakes. Use
of inappropriate
language.

There are a few
formatting issues, not
within word count,
not containing cover
page.

Quality of writing is of
an average standard.
There are a few
grammar, spelling and
punctuation mistakes.

There are minor
format issues, such as
layout is not in
professional manner
(i.e. 1.5 spacing, 12-
size font, Times New
Roman). But
assessment cover
page is included and
within the word count.

Quality of writing is of a
good standard.
Few grammar, spelling
and punctuation
mistakes.

Minor format and
layout issues,
assessment cover page
included, within the
word count.

Quality of writing is of
a high standard.
Few grammar,
spelling and
punctuation mistakes.

Format and layout in
professional manner
(i.e. 1.5 spacing, 12-
size font, Times New
Roman). Assessment
cover page included,
within the word
count.

Quality of writing at a
very high standard.
Correct grammar,
spelling and
punctuation.

Format and layout in
professional manner
(i.e. 1.5 spacing, 12-size
font, Times New
Roman). Assessment
cover page included,
within the word count.

Referencing:
Inclusion of an accurate reference list on a
separate page listing only the sources that
actually have been used. The reference list is
arranged in alphabetical order according to
the authors’ last names.

2

Utilizes less than 6
academic
references.

Does not meet the
requirement, in
terms of in-text style
and final reference
list. In-text and final
reference list are
inconsistent.

Utilizes less than 8
academic references

There are frequent
citation errors, both
in-text and in the final
reference list.

Utilizes 10 academic
references

There are occasional
referencing errors,
either in-text or in the
final reference list.
However, the in-text
and final reference list
are consistent.

Utilizes more than 10
academic references

There are very few
reference errors. In-
text and final reference
list are consistent.

Utilizes more than 12
excellent, relevant
and credible sources.

Use of APA
referencing system in
a consistent and
correct manner in the
essay itself.

Utilizes more than 14
excellent, relevant and
credible sources.

Use of APA referencing
system in a consistent
and correct manner in
the essay itself.

Late assessment penalty

5% per day x 30 marks = 1.5 marks per day

Schoolof Business and Law CQUniversity Australia CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C

Page 1 out of 2

MGMT 20135: Critical Thinking and Managerial Decision Making

Assessment 1: Practical and Written Assessment-Article Review

This assessment item accounts for 30% of your final grade for this unit and must be

completed by students individually.

Due: The assessment is due at 5.00 PM on Monday, 30th. July, 2018 AEST in Week 4.

Task: The review must be 1500 words (+/-10%) in length.

Cover page: The essay must include a cover page that contains your name, student number,

resident campus, assessment title, and lecturer.

Minimum number of peer-reviewed journal articles to pass: 10

Both on-campus students and Distance students must write a review article and submit

online via Moodle by the due date.

Format: Text should be word-processed, with appropriate layout and use of headings/sub-

headings. Times New Roman, 12 size font and line spacing (1.5).

Referencing: The list of references should form the last page or two, at the end of the

assessment. Referencing should be in a consistent APA style.

 Please save/upload your file in either a Word format ( or x) or pdf. format.

Task Description: The purpose of this task is for you to demonstrate your ability to critically

analyze, synthesize and evaluate information and present that information in a written format.

A list of articles will be available on the unit’s Moodle site for you to choose from. You

will then write a critical article review based around your responses to the following questions.

Critical Analysis

o What is the background of the research? (Background)

o What is the research problem? What do we know about the research
problem? What do we not know? (Research objective and literature
review)

o What are the core research questions the article addresses? Why are
they important to address? (Research questions)

o How was the research conducted? (Methodology)

o What where the major findings? (Findings)

o What are the significance of the findings for future research or
management practice? (Significance/implications)

Critical evaluation

School of Business and Law CQUniversity Australia CRICOS Provider Code: 02219C

Page 2 out of 2

o In your view, are there any limitations with this research?

o What are some of the assumptions that the authors have made in this
research? Do you agree with them?

o What is your overall evaluation of the article’s effectiveness and
credibility?

Please do not simply list the questions and your response to them. The questions are to be

used simply as a means for you to critically think about your chosen article. Your review

needs to contain answers to these questions, but they need to be in essay format, that is,

containing introduction section, body paragraphs and a conclusion section.