Case Study- Pediatric
Assignment (3–4 pages, not including title and reference pages):
Assignment: Child Health Case:Include the following:
- An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.
- Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.
- Identify and describe any risks and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.
- Taking into account the parents’ and caregivers’ potential sensitivities, list at least three specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.
- Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers to be proactive about their child’s health and weight.
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning Outcome in
3–4 pages, address the
following: An
explanation of the
health issues and risks
that are relevant to the
child you were assigned.
Ratings
Pts
25 to >24.0 pts
24 to >23.0 pts
23 to >17.0 pts
17 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The response
clearly, accurately,
and in detail
explains the
relevant health
issues and risks for
the assigned child.
The response
accurately
explains the
relevant health
issues and risks
for the assigned
child.
The response
vaguely and with
some inaccuracy
explains the
relevant health
issues and risks for
the assigned child.
The response is
inaccurate and/or
missing explanations
of the relevant health
issues and risks for
the assigned child.
25 pts
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeDescribe
additional information
you would need in order
to further assess his or
her weight-related
health.
Ratings
Pts
25 to >24.0 pts
24 to >23.0 pts
23 to >17.0 pts
17 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The response clearly
and accurately
describes detailed
additional
information needed
to further assess the
child’s weightrelated health.
The response
accurately
describes
additional
information
needed to further
assess the child’s
weight-related
health.
The response
vaguely and with
some inaccuracy
describes additional
information needed
to further assess the
child’s weightrelated health.
The response is
inaccurate and/or
missing a
description of
additional
information needed
to further assess the
child’s weightrelated health.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeIdentify and
describe any risks, and
consider what further
information you would
need to gain a full
understanding of the
child’s health. Think
about how you could
gather this information
in a sensitive fashion.
20 to >17.0 pts
17 to >14.0 pts
14 to >13.0 pts
13 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The response clearly
and accurately
identifies and
describes in detail
any risks to the
child’s health. The
response clearly and
accurately identifies
and describes in
detail further
information needed
to gain a full
understanding of
the child’s health,
with a detailed
explanation of how
to gather that
information in a way
that is sensitive to
the child.
The response
accurately
identifies and
describes any risks
to the child’s
health. The
response
accurately
identifies and
describes further
information
needed to gain a
full understanding
of the child’s
health, with a clear
explanation of how
to gather that
information in a
way that is
sensitive to the
child.
The response
vaguely and with
some inaccuracy
identifies and
describes any risks
to the child’s
health. The
response vaguely
identifies and
describes further
information needed
to gain a full
understanding of
the child’s health,
with a vague
explanation of how
to gather that
information in a
way that is sensitive
to the child.
The response
identifies
inaccurately and/or
is missing
descriptions of any
risks to the child’s
health. The
response identifies
inaccurately and/or
is missing
descriptions of
further information
needed to gain a full
understanding of
the child’s health,
with an inadequate
or missing
explanation of how
to gather that
information in a way
that is sensitive to
the child.
20 pts
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeTaking into
account the parents’
and caregivers’ potential
sensitivities, list at least
three specific questions
you would ask about the
child to gather more
information.
Ratings
Pts
10 to >9.0 pts
9 to >8.0 pts
8 to >7.0 pts
7 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The response clearly
and accurately lists
three or more
specific questions
that would gather
more information
about the child.
Specific questions
are carefully worded
to clearly
demonstrate
sensitivity to the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) of the
child.
The response lists
three specific
questions that
would gather more
information about
the child. Specific
questions are
worded to
demonstrate
sensitivity to the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) of the
child.
The response lists
three questions
with wording that
is vague and lacking
specificity for
gathering more
information about
the child. Some
wording of the
questions lacks
sensitivity to the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) of the
child.
The response lists
two or fewer
confusing or
inadequate
questions, or is
missing questions,
for gathering more
information about
the child. Wording
of questions
provided lacks
sensitivity to the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) of the
child.
10 pts
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeProvide at
least two strategies you
could employ to
encourage the parents
or caregivers to be
proactive about their
child’s health and
weight.
5 to >4.0 pts
4 to >3.0 pts
3 to >2.0 pts
2 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
The response
clearly describes
two or more
detailed strategies
to encourage the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) to be
proactive about the
child’s health and
weight.
The response
describes at least
two strategies to
encourage the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) to be
proactive about
the child’s health
and weight.
The response
vaguely describes
two strategies to
encourage the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) to be
proactive about
the child’s health
and weight.
The response
inadequately
describes one
strategy or is missing
strategies to
encourage the
parent(s) or
caregiver(s) to be
proactive about the
child’s health and
weight.
5 pts
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeWritten
Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and
Organization:
Paragraphs make clear
points that support
well-developed ideas,
flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity
of ideas. Sentences are
carefully focused-neither long and
rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A
clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and
introduction are
provided that delineate
all required criteria.
Ratings
Pts
5 to >4.0 pts
4 to >3.0 pts
3 to >2.0 pts
2 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards for
flow, continuity, and
clarity. A clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion are
provided that
delineate all required
criteria.
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity 80% of
the time. Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment are
stated, yet are brief
and not descriptive.
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity 60%–
79% of the time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment are
vague or off topic.
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow,
continuity, and
clarity < 60% of
the time. No
purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion were
provided.
5 pts
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeWritten
Expression and
Formatting - English
writing standards:
Correct grammar,
mechanics, and proper
punctuation
This criterion is linked to
a Learning
OutcomeWritten
Expression and
Formatting - The paper
follows correct APA
format for title page,
headings, font,
spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers, running
heads, parenthetical/intext citations, and
reference list.
Ratings
Pts
5 to >4.0 pts
4 to >3.0 pts
3 to >2.0 pts
2 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation with
no errors.
Contains a few (1
or 2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
Contains several
(3 or 4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
Contains many (≥ 5)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors that
interfere with the
reader’s understanding.
5 to >4.0 pts
4 to >3.0 pts
3 to >2.0 pts
2 to >0 pts
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Uses correct APA
format with no
errors.
Contains a few (1 or
2) APA format
errors.
Contains several (3
or 4) APA format
errors.
Contains many (≥
5) APA format
errors.
5 pts
5 pts
NURS_6512_Week_3_Assignment_1_Rubric
Criteria
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext
Ratings
Pts
Top-quality papers guaranteed
100% original papers
We sell only unique pieces of writing completed according to your demands.
Confidential service
We use security encryption to keep your personal data protected.
Money-back guarantee
We can give your money back if something goes wrong with your order.
Enjoy the free features we offer to everyone
-
Title page
Get a free title page formatted according to the specifics of your particular style.
-
Custom formatting
Request us to use APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, or any other style for your essay.
-
Bibliography page
Don’t pay extra for a list of references that perfectly fits your academic needs.
-
24/7 support assistance
Ask us a question anytime you need to—we don’t charge extra for supporting you!
Calculate how much your essay costs
What we are popular for
- English 101
- History
- Business Studies
- Management
- Literature
- Composition
- Psychology
- Philosophy
- Marketing
- Economics