Rubric Benchmark

Rubic_Print_Format

Course CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal Points
SPD-330SPD-330-O500Benchmark – Language Disabilities and Assistive Technology Unit Plan300.0
CriteriaPercentage1: No Submission (0.00%)2: Insufficient (65.00%)3: Approaching (75.00%)4: Acceptable (85.00%)5: Target (100.00%)CommentsPoints Earned
CRITERIA100.0%
Classroom and Student Factors/Grouping5.0%Not addressed.Classroom and student factors and their effect on planning, teaching, and assessing students are insignificant to the development of the lesson or are insufficiently described.Classroom and student factors and their effect on planning, teaching, and assessing students minimally relate to the development of the lesson and are cursorily described.Classroom and student factors and their effect on planning, teaching, and assessing students are relevant to the development of the lesson and clearly described.Classroom and student factors and their effect on planning, teaching, and assessing students are meaningful for the development of the lesson and skillfully described.You did not describe the classroom and student factors and their effect on planning, teaching, and assessing students are insignificant to the development of the lesson9.75/15.00
Standards and Learning Targets/Objectives5.0%Not addressed.The objective is not skill-based or measurable. It is not appropriate for students, and ineffectively aligned with the state standard.The objective is somewhat skill-based and measurable. It is sufficient for the students who will be taught the lesson, and generally aligned with the state standard.The objective is skill-based, measurable, developmentally-appropriate, and effectively aligned with the state standard.The objective is performance-driven, measurable, developmentally-appropriate, and directly aligned with the state standard.Good job referencing the academic standards. Your objectives are skill based, measurable, and developmentally-appropriate for the student. Don’t forget that April is apart of the class so planning should be inclusive of her and her needs, not singularly focused.12.75/15.00
Vocabulary and Academic Language5.0%Not addressed.Vocabulary and academic language is missing several key terms, or terms presented are not relevant. Teaching strategies are inappropriate or underdeveloped.Vocabulary and academic language is sufficient, although missing some key terms, or includes a term that is irrelevant. Includes adequate strategies for teaching the new terms.Appropriate vocabulary and academic terms are listed along with clear and relevant strategies for teaching the new terms.An ideal list of vocabulary and academic terms are included along with innovative and engaging strategies for teaching the new terms.The vocabulary is broad and general as it relates to the academic standards and they are not associated with any specified text.11.25/15.00
Resources, Materials, Equipment, and Technology5.0%Not addressed.Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are inappropriate for the lesson.Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are adequate for the lesson.Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are appropriate for the lesson.Resources, materials, equipment, and technology are innovative and enhance the lesson.The AAC should be referenced as it is a form of equipment & technology that should be incorporated in instruction and planned for.11.25/15.00
Depth of Knowledge Lesson Questions10.0%Not addressed.Irrelevant or unrelated questions are given and will not meet the diverse students outlined in the Class Profile.Vague or unfocused questions are given and do not assess all levels of student understanding to meet the diverse students outlined in the Class Profile.Clear and relevant questions are created to assess all levels of student understanding to meet the diverse students outlined in the Class Profile.Creative and thoughtful questions are created to assess all levels of student understanding to meet the diverse students outlined in the Class Profile.Your questions are anchored in the DOK framing.25.50/30.00
Anticipatory Set5.0%Not addressed.Anticipatory set is insufficient to engage students and activate prior knowledge.Anticipatory set marginally engages students and activates prior knowledge.Anticipatory set is clearly designed to engage students and activate prior knowledge.Anticipatory set is designed to creatively engage students and meaningfully activate prior knowledge.Your anticipatory set can engage the students but the activity/presentation of the information should have been differentiated and not repetitive. The plan should be inclusive of April and not singularly focused on her as there are other students in the class that need structured support.11.25/15.00
Multiple Means of Representation and Differentiation [CEC 5.4, ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.S19, IGC.5.S13, IGC.5.S14, IGC.5.S16, IGC.5.S17, IGC.5.S18, IGC.5.S19, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24; InTASC 2(e); COE 2.9]10.0%Not addressed.Presents content using inappropriate methods or tools that inadequately meet the needs of students in developing language and communication skills. The skills taught may not align to the identified ELA standard. Differentiation strategies insufficiently address the students’ needs, and may not include the use of the AAC system identified in the goal.Presents content using sufficient methods or tools that generally meet the needs of students in developing language and communication skills aligned to the identified ELA standard. Differentiation strategies broadly address the students’ needs and include the use of the AAC system identified in the goal.Presents content using sound, developmentally-appropriate methods or tools that meet the needs of students in developing language and communication skills aligned to the identified ELA standard. Differentiation strategies clearly address the students’ needs and incorporate the use of the AAC system identified in the goal.Creatively presents content using a variety of developmentally-appropriate methods or tools that meet the needs of diverse students in developing language and communication skills aligned to the identified ELA standard. Differentiation strategies meaningfully address the students’ needs, incorporating the use of the AAC system identified in the goal.Good job providing support to all groups of learners. What if a student doesn’t have a hearing or visual impairment? There is no incorporation of the AAC system. Use the term native language not "mother language" as that term has a negative connotation. Students helping other students is not a form of differentiation nor is it an educational advancement for the students who finished early or are gifted.22.50/30.00
Multiple Means of Engagement and Differentiation [CEC 5.7, ICSI.5.S14, ICSI.5.S15, ICSI.5.S16, IGC.5.S3, IGC.5.S10; InTASC 5(a), 7(h); MC1, MC2, MC4; COE 3.12]10.0%Not addressed.Engagement plan does not adequately allow students to explore, practice, and apply the content and academic language, nor does it sufficiently develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Differentiation strategies insufficiently address the needs, and may not include the use of the AAC system identified in the goal.Engagement plan generally allows students to explore, practice, and apply the content and academic language, while developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Differentiation strategies simplistically address the needs of April and include the use of the AAC system identified in the goal.Engagement plan soundly allows students to explore, practice, and apply the content and academic language, while developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Differentiation strategies reasonably address the students’ needs, incorporating the use of the AAC system identified in the goal.Engagement plan innovatively allows students to explore, practice, and apply the content and academic language, while developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Differentiation strategies meaningfully address the students’ needs, incorporating the use of the AAC system identified in the goalYour engagement plan does not allow students to explore, practice, and apply the content and academic language, while developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Your differentiation strategies do not address the needs of April and include the use of the AAC system identified in the goal. Students helping other students is not a form of differentiation nor is it an educational advancement for the students who finished early or are gifted.22.50/30.00
Multiple Means of Expression and Differentiation [CEC 5.2, ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.K3, ICSI.5.S7, ICSI.5.S14, IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.K3, IGC.5.S1, IGC.5.S7, IGC.5.S23, IGC.5.S24, IGC.5.S25, IGC.5.S29; InTASC 6(g), 6(i), 6(r), 8(b); ISTE-E 3b, 5b, 5c, 6b; MC1, MC4; COE 4.6]10.0%Not addressed.Formative and summative assessments are inadequately designed to monitor students’ progress toward the identified learning targets/objectives. Differentiation strategies insufficiently address the students’ needs, and may not include the use of the AAC system identified in the IEP goals.Formative and summative assessments are adequately designed to monitor students’ progress toward the identified learning targets/objectives. Differentiation strategies simplistically address the needs of April and include the use of the AAC system identified in the IEP goals.Formative and summative assessments are technically sound and clearly designed to monitor students’ progress toward the identified learning targets/objectives. Differentiation strategies reasonably address the needs of April, incorporating the use of the AAC system identified in the IEP goals.Formative and summative assessments are technically sound and superbly designed to monitor students’ progress toward the identified learning targets/objectives. Differentiation strategies meaningfully address the needs of April, incorporating the use of the AAC system identified in the IEP goals.Your formative and summative assessments are not designed to monitor students’ progress toward the identified learning targets/objectives. Differentiation strategies simplistically address the needs of April and include the use of the AAC system identified in the IEP goals.22.50/30.00
Extension Activity and/or Homework5.0%Not addressed.Extension activities and/or homework are unrealistic, developmentally inappropriate for the students, or unrelated to the unit’s learning objective.Extension activities and/or homework are either simplistic or overly complicated. They minimally meet the developmentally needs of the students. They broadly align to the unit’s learning objective.Extension activities and/or homework are clear, developmentally appropriate, and appropriately aligned to the unit’s learning objective.Extension activities and/or homework are creative, developmentally appropriate, and fully aligned to the unit’s learning objective.Extension activities and/or homework are very simplistic and vague in addressing and reinforcing the objective. They minimally meet the developmentally needs of the students. They broadly align to the unit’s learning objective.11.25/15.00
Rationale: Part 1 [CEC 1.2, ICSI.1.K3, ICSI.1.K4, ICSI.1.K7, ICSI.1.K12, ICSI.1.K13, IGC.1.K4, IGC.1.S1; InTASC 1(a), 1(b), 1(d), 1(e), 1(f), 1(h), 1(j), 2(a), 2(b), 2(g), 2(h), 2(l); MC1, MC2, MC3, MC5; COE 1.7]10.0%Not addressed.Rationale insufficiently articulates why the unit instructional choices made are ideal for meeting April’s needs.Rationale adequately articulates why the unit instructional choices made are ideal for meeting April’s needs.Rationale clearly articulates why the unit instructional choices made are ideal for meeting April’s needs.Rationale comprehensively articulates why the unit instructional choices made are ideal for meeting April’s needs.You did not provide a rationale that articulates why the unit instructional choices made are ideal for meeting April’s needs.0.00/30.00
Rationale: Part 2 [CEC 5.3, ICSI.5.K2, ICSI.5.K3, ICSI.5.S15, ICSI.5.S19, ICSI.5.S20, IGC.5.K1, IGC.5.S7, IGC.5.S21; InTASC 3(h), 8(g); MC1, MC4; COE 3.9]10.0%Not addressed.Rationale insufficiently articulates how the selected augmentative and alternative communication systems assistive technology used in the lesson plan is appropriate for meeting April’s needs.Rationale adequately articulates how the selected augmentative and alternative communication systems assistive technology used in the lesson plan is appropriate for meeting April’s needs.Rationale clearly articulates how the selected augmentative and alternative communication systems assistive technology used in the lesson plan is appropriate for meeting April’s needs.Rationale comprehensively articulates how the selected augmentative and alternative communication systems assistive technology used in the lesson plan is appropriate for meeting April’s needs.You did not provide a rationale that articulates how the selected augmentative and alternative communication systems assistive technology used in the lesson plan is appropriate for meeting April’s needs.0.00/30.00
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Not addressed.Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Includes some appropriate practice and content-related language.Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. Includes appropriate practice and content-related language.Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language.Good use of spelling, grammar, and sentence structure.12.75/15.00
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)5.0%Not addressed.Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although several formatting errors are present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.You did not document or cite any sources as required by the assignment. The requirement was to support your work with 2-3 scholarly resources.0.00/15.00

Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Writall
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Business Studies
good
Customer 454567, December 2nd, 2020
Education
Awesome service and amazing quality! I'll definitely be using it again when needed.
Customer 455113, November 15th, 2021
Law
Thanks for your help on this. A couple of the references and footnotes needed minor adjustments however no issue to do. Thanks so much!
Customer 455105, November 14th, 2021
Business Studies
unbelievable work!! outstanding!!!
Customer 454811, January 14th, 2022
IT, Web
good job
Customer 455223, December 21st, 2021
Sports
Great stuff
Customer 455371, June 26th, 2022
IT, Web
Good job
Customer 455223, December 21st, 2021
Philosophy
i like the customer services and the revision was on time. This is my third time using this website. i would recommend them. Just specify what you want and you will get an A in your paper.
Customer 454429, June 16th, 2020
Education
Thank you for awesome communication and a fast turnaround! I will definitely be using your services again!
Customer 455113, November 22nd, 2021
Business Studies
great job!
Customer 454811, February 21st, 2022
History
I got my essay 3 hours earlier, use this site instead of papersowl or edubirdie trust me I got scammed. This website is actually legit :) - Happy
Customer 455051, November 1st, 2021
Nursing
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!! Fantastic job!
Customer 454991, November 30th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp