RUBRIC FOR PATHO 7 DISCUSSION.

Outstanding PerformanceExcellent PerformanceCompetent PerformanceRoom for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.44 (44%) – 44 (44%)Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources40 (40%) – 43 (43%)Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts main discussion by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participation
First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
First Response: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited
First Response: Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Second Response: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited
Second Response: Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation Posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participation
Total Points: 100
  1. Applied Sciences
  2. Architecture and Design
  3. Biology
  4. Business & Finance
  5. Chemistry
  6. Computer Science
  7. Geography
  8. Geology
  9. Education
  10. Engineering
  11. English
  12. Environmental science
  13. Spanish
  14. Government
  15. History
  16. Human Resource Management
  17. Information Systems
  18. Law
  19. Literature
  20. Mathematics
  21. Nursing
  22. Physics
  23. Political Science
  24. Psychology
  25. Reading
  26. Science
  27. Social Science

Copyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
RUBRIC FOR PATHO 7 DISCUSSION.
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
How it works
Receive a 100% original paper that will pass Turnitin from a top essay writing service
step 1
Upload your instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
Pro service tips
How to get the most out of your experience with Writall
One writer throughout the entire course
If you like the writer, you can hire them again. Just copy & paste their ID on the order form ("Preferred Writer's ID" field). This way, your vocabulary will be uniform, and the writer will be aware of your needs.
The same paper from different writers
You can order essay or any other work from two different writers to choose the best one or give another version to a friend. This can be done through the add-on "Same paper from another writer."
Copy of sources used by the writer
Our college essay writers work with ScienceDirect and other databases. They can send you articles or materials used in PDF or through screenshots. Just tick the "Copy of sources" field on the order form.
Testimonials
See why 20k+ students have chosen us as their sole writing assistance provider
Check out the latest reviews and opinions submitted by real customers worldwide and make an informed decision.
Nursing
My first-time using this site and I am pleased. Thank you.
Customer 455081, November 5th, 2021
Aviation
Thank you for the hard work, very little revision on my part.
Customer 455121, November 29th, 2021
English 101
Incredible service and final paper! I couldn't be happier. Thank you so much!
Customer 454867, September 8th, 2021
Nursing
Thank you so much.
Customer 455319, April 19th, 2022
Other
Perfect as always, thank you!
Customer 452961, July 7th, 2020
Psychology
thank you custom scholars. you are awesome
Customer 454893, January 30th, 2022
Nursing
Thank you!!
Customer 454959, February 6th, 2022
Business Studies
This is exactly what I was looking for and you all helped me out so much! Thank you!!!!!
Customer 454769, June 16th, 2021
Other
Great Writer
Customer 454983, March 7th, 2022
Other
I didn't receive my paper within the 6 hour window as requested however, the person who worked on it requested an extension by providing communication. Thank you for doing this.
Customer 455371, May 18th, 2022
Business Studies
good
Customer 454567, February 21st, 2022
Nursing
THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!! Fantastic job!
Customer 454991, November 30th, 2021
11,595
Customer reviews in total
96%
Current satisfaction rate
3 pages
Average paper length
37%
Customers referred by a friend
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp