RUBRIC FOR PATHO 7 DISCUSSION.

Outstanding PerformanceExcellent PerformanceCompetent PerformanceRoom for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.44 (44%) – 44 (44%)Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources40 (40%) – 43 (43%)Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references35 (35%) – 39 (39%)Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references31 (31%) – 34 (34%)Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references0 (0%) – 30 (30%)Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts main discussion by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participation
First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
First Response: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited
First Response: Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.9 (9%) – 9 (9%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)Response is on topic, may have some depth0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Second Response: Writing6 (6%) – 6 (6%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 4 (4%)Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited
Second Response: Timely and full participation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Meets requirements for timely and full participation Posts by due date0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)NA0 (0%) – 0 (0%)Does not meet requirement for full participation
Total Points: 100
  1. Applied Sciences
  2. Architecture and Design
  3. Biology
  4. Business & Finance
  5. Chemistry
  6. Computer Science
  7. Geography
  8. Geology
  9. Education
  10. Engineering
  11. English
  12. Environmental science
  13. Spanish
  14. Government
  15. History
  16. Human Resource Management
  17. Information Systems
  18. Law
  19. Literature
  20. Mathematics
  21. Nursing
  22. Physics
  23. Political Science
  24. Psychology
  25. Reading
  26. Science
  27. Social Science

Copyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
RUBRIC FOR PATHO 7 DISCUSSION.
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
Calculator

Calculate the price of your paper

Total price:$26
Our features

We've got everything to become your favourite writing service

Need a better grade?
We've got you covered.

Order your paper
Live Chat+1(978) 822-0999EmailWhatsApp

Order your essay today and save 20% with the discount code GOLDEN

seoartvin escortizmir escortelazığ escortbacklink satışbacklink saleseskişehir oto kurtarıcıeskişehir oto kurtarıcıoto çekicibacklink satışbacklink satışıbacklink satışbacklink