Self Reflection
PPD221 – CRAFTING YOUR FUTURE Task brief & rubrics
Final Assessment
Individual Task.
Please write a 2,000-word self-reflection essay in which you discuss and evaluate what you have learned about yourself in relation to the three areas of the course – personality, mind and skills development. Please reflect on your strengths, insights and areas for future development and in addition, include what you learned from the mandatory speaker events you attended.
Formalities:
· Submission – Word document
· Word limit: 2,000 words
· Font: Arial 12,5 pts.
· Text alignment: Justified.
· Essay structure – beginning, middle and conclusion.
· Any in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.
· Use and application of relevant key concepts, theories, and models
Submission: Week 12 Via Moodle on Turnitin.
Weight: This task will receive a pass or fail grade for this subject. Deadline: 12th January 23:59 CEST
It assesses the following learning outcomes:
· Assess the different elements that enhance the student self-awareness and self-management, which support self-confidence and efficacy.
· Define the personal competences needed for the twenty-first century.
· Assess the different elements that are involved in personal integrity.
· Differentiate and adopt appropriate manners in different contexts
Rubrics
Exceptional 90-100 | Good 80-89 | Fair 70-79 | Marginal fail 60-69 | |
Knowledge & Understanding (20%) | Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner. | Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary. | Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary. | Student understands the task and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum amount of relevant vocabulary. |
Application (30%) | Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. | Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. | Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident. | Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident. |
Critical Thinking (30%) | Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors. | Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references. | Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant. | Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources. |
Communication (20%) | Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck | Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting word count, grammar and spellcheck | Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the wordcount limit. Some misspelling errors may be evident. | Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. Does not reach or does exceed wordcount excessively and misspelling errors are evident. |