HCM520 Portfolio Project

Quality and Risk Assessment Presentation

As healthcare leaders, it is important to combine your knowledge of management and quality to understand and improve the organization (Spath, 2022). For your final Portfolio Project, you will do a presentation that encompasses some of the key concepts covered in this course.

You will start by watching the following video:

Chasing Zero: Winning the War on Healthcare HarmLinks to an external site.

Your goal is to address the areas of risk and quality improvement related to health/medical errors, as well as to safeguard future patients from having their safety compromised like what occurred in the video.

Instructions:

Your quality and risk assessment of the video must include:

• Choose three (3) different medical error scenarios (or cases) discussed in the video
• Discuss the 3 medical errors and root causes of errors. Be sure to include the following:Nature of error (error and root cause)Patient outcome
• Identify the risk and discuss the risk management plans for each error scenario.
• Determine the difference between system and process breakdowns that lead to medical errors
• Discuss statistical tools that could be used to improve safety
• Discuss how the following could impact patient safety:Staff handoffStaff fatigueStaff incompetence
• How does technology improve patient safety?
• How does simulation improve quality?
• What are your main take-a-way points from the video?

Submission Requirements:Your presentation should meet the following requirements:

• Be 8-12 slides in length, not including the title or reference slides.
• Be formatted for a formal presentation including headings per slide, major points per slide, and presentation notes to supplement each slide provided as if you were doing the actual presentation.
• Be formatted according to APA 7th Edition.
• Cite at least eight credible references. Include citations to support the statements made and for each of the references listed on your reference slide(s).
• Be submitted as a PowerPoint file. Do not submit the presentation as a PDF file.
• Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

WHAT SHAPES
ATTITUDES ON
CLIMATE CHANGE?
STUDENT NAME
STATE UNIVERSITY
COURSE CODE: COURSE NAME
INSTRUCTOR
DUE DATE
COUNTRY-LEVEL INFLUENCES ON
PERCEPTIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
• Nationalism
Figure 1
Sao Paulo
• Culture
• Weather
• Gross domestic product
(GDP) and carbon output
Note: Adapted from Sao Paulo, by S. Souza, 2018, Unsplash
(https://unsplash.com/photos/j_MgyPHGRP0). In the public domain.
NATIONALISM
Figure 2
Crude oil mining at sunset
• Resource nationalism: “a form of nationalist
rhetoric that uplifts and sacralizes soil-rooted
national resources as a common good even though
only a tiny minority of the population actually
benefits from their extraction and exploitation”
(Conversi, 2020, p. 6)
• Government adopts pro-business agenda
(Conversi, 2020; Bidone & Kovacic, 2018)
•
•
•
•
•
Oil and petroleum in Saudi Arabia
Fossil fuels in Russia
Coal and shale in Poland
Coal in India
Deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon
Note: Adapted from Pump-jack mining crude oil with the sunset, by Z. Burival, 2018,
Unsplash (https://unsplash.com/photos/GrmwVnVSSdU). In the public domain.
CULTURE
Figure 3
Protestors at Washington Monument
• Perception that climate change is a global and
uncontrollable problem correlated with inaction
• Collectivism and egalitarianism associated with proenvironmental behaviors
• Recognition of how climate change
disproportionately affects marginalized groups and
the global south (Davine et al., 2017; Friedman,
2020)
• Individualistic and hierarchical values associated with
climate change skepticism (Lahsen, 2013; Tranter &
Booth, 2015; Xiang et al., 2019)
Note. Adapted from Reject and protect, by V. Pickering, 2014, Flickr
(https://www.flickr.com/photos/vpickering/15499171889/). CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.
WEATHER
Figure 4
Arial View of a Hurricane
• Personal experience, or lack thereof, with
shifts in weather shapes beliefs in existence
of climate change (Capstick & Pidgeon, 2014;
Pelham, 2018; Haltinner & Sarathchandra,
2018)
• Living/being in cold temperatures (both
indoors and outdoors) correlated with
climate skepticism (Pelham, 2018)
• Geographic susceptibility to catastrophic
weather events correlated with belief in
climate change (Tranter & Booth, 2015)
Note. Adapted from Hurricane map, by NASA, 2016, Unsplash
(https://unsplash.com/photos/i9w4Uy1pU-s). In the public
domain.
GDP AND CARBON OUTPUT
Figure 5
Climate Change Deniers by Country
• Higher CO2 emissions correlated with
higher gross domestic product (GDP)
(Hughes & Herian, 2017)
• Industrialization and economic growth
coupled with environmental degradation
• Higher CO2 emissions a predictor of
climate change skepticism (Tranter &
Booth, 2015)
• Climate change skepticism China and India
tied to nationalism and anti-Western
sentiment (Fisher, 2012; Liu, 2019)
Note. Adapted from Where most climate change deniers live, by Statista, 2019
(https://www.statista.com/chart/19449/countries-with-biggest-share-of-climate-change-deniers/).
CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.
REFERENCES
•
Al-Saqaf, W., & Berglez, P. (2019). How do social media users link different types of extreme events to climate change? A study of Twitter during 2008–2017. Journal of Extreme
Events, 6(2), Article 1950002. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737619500027
•
Bidone, F., & Kovacic, Z. (2018). From nationalism to global climate change: Analysis of the historical evolution of environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon. International
Forestry Review, 20(4).
•
Burival, Z. (2018). Pump-jack mining crude oil with the sunset [Stock image]. Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/GrmwVnVSSdU
•
Capstick, S. B., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2014). Public perception of cold weather events as evidence for and against climate change. Climatic Change, 122, 695–708.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1003-1
•
Conversi, D. (2020). The ultimate challenge: Nationalism and climate change. Nationalities Papers, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2020.18
•
Davine, T., Lawhon, M., & Pierce, J. (2017). Place‐making at a national scale: Framing tar sands extraction as “Canadian” in The Globe and Mail. The Canadian Geographer, 61(3),
428–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12392
•
Diehl, T., Huber, B., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Liu, J. (2019). Social media and beliefs about climate change: A cross-national analysis of news use, political ideology, and trust in science.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Article edz040. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz040
•
Fisher, S. (2012). Policy storylines in Indian climate politics: Opening new political spaces? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30, 109–127.
https://doi.org/10.1068/c10186
•
Friedman, L. (2020, March 25). Standing Rock Sioux Tribe wins a victory in Dakota Access Pipeline case. The New York Times.

REFERENCES
•
Holden, E. (2020, January 8). How the oil industry has spent billions to control the climate change conversation. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/jan/08/oilcompanies-climate-crisis-pr-spending
•
Hughes, L., & Herian, A. (2017, September 12). The correlation between GDP and greenhouse gas emissions. Policy Options. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/september2017/the-correlation-between-gdp-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions/
•
Lahsen, M. (2013). Anatomy of dissent: A cultural analysis of climate skepticism. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 732–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469799
•
Liu, J. C.-E. (2015). Low carbon plot: Climate change skepticism with Chinese characteristics. Environmental Sociology, 1(4), 280–292.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2015.1049811
•
NASA. (2016). Hurricane map [Stock image]. Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/i9w4Uy1pU-s
•
Pelham, B. W. (2018). Not in my back yard: Egocentrism and climate change skepticism across the globe. Environmental Science and Policy, 89, 421–429.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.004
•
Pickering, V. (2014). Reject and protect [Stock image]. Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/vpickering/15499171889/
•
Souza, S. (2018). Sao Paulo [Stock image]. Unsplash. https://unsplash.com/photos/j_MgyPHGRP0
•
Statista. (2019). Where most climate change deniers live [Infographic]. https://www.statista.com/chart/19449/countries-with-biggest-share-of-climate-change-deniers/
•
Tranter, B., & Booth, K. (2015). Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change, 33, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003
HCM520 Mod 8 PP
HCM520 Mod 8 PP
Criteria
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Content
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Requirements
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Analysis
Ratings
45 to >36.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate
knowledge of risk management and
quality improvement; correctly
represents knowledge from the readings
and sources.
30 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all
of the required
components, as specified
in the assignment.
36 to >27.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions
in demonstration of
knowledge.
24 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes
most of the required
components, as specified
in the assignment.
60 to >48.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or adequate thought,
insight and analysis of concepts and
applications regarding risk management
and quality improvement.
Pts
27 to >18.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
18 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes
some of the required
components, as specified in
the assignment.
48 to >36.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions
in thought, insight and
analysis.
18 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials.
45 pts
12 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few
of the required
components, as specified
in the assignment.
30 pts
36 to >24.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in thought,
insight and analysis.
24 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
thought, insight and
analysis.
60 pts
HCM520 Mod 8 PP
Criteria
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Synthesis and
Evaluation
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Decision
Making
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Sources
Ratings
60 to >48.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate
synthesis and evaluation of course
concepts in risk management and
quality improvement in healthcare.
60 to >48.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate thought
and insight in decision making regarding
risk management and quality improvement
in healthcare.
48 to >36.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions
in synthesis and
evaluation.
Pts
36 to >24.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
synthesis and
evaluation.
48 to >36.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions
in decision making.
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least eight credible sources, as
required by the assignment: Cite at least eight
scholarly references. Four of these references must be
from outside sources, and four must be from course
readings, lectures, and textbooks.
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Cites and
integrates seven
credible sources.
24 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
synthesis and
evaluation.
60 pts
36 to >24.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
decision making.
24 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
decision making.
60 pts
12 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Cites and
integrates six
credible sources.
8 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Cites and
integrates fewer
than six credible
sources.
20 pts
HCM520 Mod 8 PP
Criteria
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Application of
Source
Material
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Organization
Ratings
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to
provide substance and perspectives on
the issue; knowledge from the course
linked properly to source material.
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized,
well written, and in proper
essay format including an
introduction, body, and
conclusion. Conforms to
project requirements.
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but not
major problems with
selection and linkage of
sources.
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant
but not major flaws in
organization and writing; is
in proper essay format. In a
minor way does not
conform to project
requirements.
Pts
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems
with selection and
linkage of sources.
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is
seriously flawed; no
linkage to knowledge
from the course.
20 pts
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in
organization and writing;
does not completely follow
proper essay format. In a
significant way does not
conform to project
requirements.
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well
organized or well
written and is not in
proper essay format.
Does not conform to
project requirements.
20 pts
HCM520 Mod 8 PP
Criteria
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Grammar and
Style
This criterion
is linked to a
Learning
Outcome
Demonstrates
proper use of
APA style
Total Points: 350
Ratings
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and paragraph
structure; few or no minor
errors in grammar and
spelling; appropriate writing
style; clear and concise with
no unsupported comments.
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper
APA formatting, with no
more than one significant
error.
Pts
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Small number of
significant but not
major errors in
grammar and spelling;
generally appropriate
writing.
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to inadequate
sentence and paragraph
development; work needed
on grammar and spelling;
does not meet program
expectations.
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality;
unacceptable in terms of
grammar and/or spelling;
inappropriate writing
style that interferes with
clarity.
20 pts
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA
formatting, with no more
than two to three significant
errors.
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA
formatting, with four to
five significant errors.
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA
formatting, with more
than five significant
errors.
15 pts
Adding Speaker Notes to a Presentation
Speaker notes are typically intended to be used as a tool for a presenter to remember important
points that they want to speak about in their presentation. Speaker notes are different from the
main points that a presenter will include on a slide, because only the speaker can see them. The
information that you include in speaker notes should consist of information that you want to
verbally share during a presentation, but may not want to include on your slides.
Expectations for Visual Presentation Assignments
Students are expected to upload their presentations and include detailed speaker notes so the
professor can have a clear idea of what information would be presented. In these instances, your
speaker notes should essentially be a description of what you would say if presenting verbally.
Be sure to include speaker notes for all slides where you would typically speak, including your
introduction and conclusion.
Speaker notes should be thorough and expand on the content in the slide. Minimize the amount
of content on the slide to make it readable and visually appealing. When supporting your claims
with evidence, use in-text citations as you would for an essay formatted assignment. Every slide,
with the exception of your title and reference slide, should include speaker notes. See the
example slide with speaker notes below:
Speaker Notes Text: Resource nationalism contributes to climate change skepticism by aligning
economic and political stability with the success of big businesses and corporations responsible
for the extraction of natural resources. Residents of these countries might view extraction of
natural resources as a right that supersedes any negative environmental impacts and therefore
deny or minimize the existence of a climate change as a result (Conversi, 2020). Major oil, coal,
and natural gas corporations often wield political power against pro-environmentalist initiatives
or rebrand themselves as part of the solution to climate change (Holden, 2020). In countries
where the production of fossil fuels is integral to the economy, the oil industry is able to
capitalize on nationalism by solidifying itself as critical to the future stability and success of the
country.