MHACB 516 : Scanning the Health Sector as an Industry Expert

MHACB/515 Competency 1 Assessment and RubricCourse Title: Scanning the Health Sector as an Industry Expert
Competency Assessment Title: The Impact of IHI’s Triple and Quadruple Aim Initiatives
Assignment Directions
Read the IHI Triple Aim Initiative page on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s (IHI) website, read Triple Aim for Populations, and watch the
video “An Overview of the IHI Triple Aim,” all located on the IHI website.
Select a health care organization with which you work or are familiar.
Assume you are a strategic planning manager with your selected health care organization. You have been asked to prepare an evaluation of the
IHI Triple Aim goals and how they apply to your organization.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word evaluation of the impact of implementing Triple Aim goals nationally, as well as how they apply to your selected
organization. Your evaluation must incorporate 3 parts:
Part I: IHI Triple Aim Goals
Include the following in your evaluation:
•
•
•
•
An overview of the history of the IHI Triple Aim elements
An evaluation of progress to date in meeting these goals nationally
A determination of whether these dimensions have been achieved, will be achieved, or cannot be achieved
A rationale to support your perspective
Part II: Evaluation of Application of IHI Triple Aim Goals Application in Your Organization
Include the following:
•
•
Identify the data that you analyzed to support your perspective of how each aim can or can’t be applied to your organization.
Identify the data you would measure to determine the success of each, if applicable to your organization, in the future.
Part III: IHI’s Quadruple Aim
Include the following:
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
MHACB/515 Competency 1 Rubric
Page 2 of 3
•
•
Analyze the IHI’s position on the quadruple aim and whether you believe that it should become the standard for all organizations.
Justify your position and support it with scholarly literature.
Cite 3 reputable references to support your assignment (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or
other sources of similar quality).
Format your citations according to APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment.
Resources
•
•
•
Center for Writing Excellence
Reference and Citation Generator
Grammar Assistance
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
MHACB/515 Competency 1 Rubric
Page 3 of 3
Competency Assessment Rubric
Assignment/Performance
Criteria
Mastery
100%
Meets Expectations
85%
Not Met
0%
1. Part I: IHI Triple Aim
Goals
(weight 40%)
The evaluation fully described an
overview of the history of the IHI
Triple Aim elements; clearly related
the progress to date in meeting
these rules nationally;
comprehensively explained
whether these dimensions have
been achieved, will be achieved, or
cannot be achieved; and astutely
identified a rationale to support the
student’s perspective.
The evaluation partially described
an overview of the history of the IHI
Triple Aim elements; sufficiently
related the progress to date in
meeting these rules nationally;
moderately explained whether
these dimensions have been
achieved, will be achieved, or
cannot be achieved; and nominally
identified a rationale to support the
student’s perspective.
The evaluation did not describe an
overview of the history of the IHI Triple
Aim elements, nor did it relate the
progress to date in meeting these rules
nationally. It did not explain whether
these dimensions have been achieved,
will be achieved, or cannot be
achieved; and did not identify a
rationale to support the student’s
perspective.
2. Part II: Evaluation of
Application of IHI Triple
Aim Goals Application in
Your Organization
(weight 30%)
The evaluation fully identified the
data analyzed to support the
perspective of how each aim can
or can’t be applied to the
organization, and clearly related
the data the student would
measure to determine the success
of each aim, if applicable to the
organization, in the future.
The evaluation nominally identified
the data analyzed to support the
perspective of how each aim can or
can’t be applied to the organization,
and somewhat related the data the
student would measure to
determine the success of each aim,
if applicable to the organization, in
the future.
The evaluation did not identify the data
analyzed to support the perspective of
how each aim can or can’t be applied to
the organization and did not relate the
data the student would measure to
determine the success of each aim, if
applicable to the organization, in the
future.
3. Part III: IHI’s
Quadruple Aim
(weight 25%)
The evaluation comprehensively
analyzed the IHI’s position on the
quadruple aim and whether it
should become the standard for all
organizations, justified with support
from scholarly literature.
The evaluation sufficiently analyzed
the IHI’s position on the quadruple
aim and whether it should become
the standard for all organizations,
partially justified with support from
scholarly literature.
The evaluation did not analyze the IHI’s
position on the quadruple aim and
whether it should become the standard
for all organizations and did not justify
with support from scholarly literature.
4. Grammar and Writing
Mechanics
(weight 5%)
Accuracy in grammar, sentence
structures, sentence boundaries,
and word choice enhanced
content; citations accurately
formatted as per APA guidelines.
Rare inaccuracies/errors in
grammar, sentence structures,
sentence boundaries, and word
choice did not detract from the
content; rare inaccuracies/errors in
formatting citations as per APA
guidelines.
Occasional or frequent
inaccuracies/errors in grammar,
sentence structures, sentence
boundaries, and word choice detracted
from the content; occasional or frequent
inaccuracies/errors in formatting
citations as per APA guidelines.
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
MHACB/515 Competency 2 Assessment and Rubric
Course Title: Scanning the Health Sector as an Industry Expert
Competency Assessment Title: Innovations in Health Care Article
Assignment Directions
Select a health care organization with which you work or are familiar.
Assume you are the public relations director for your selected health care organization. You have been asked to prepare an article on several
recent health care innovations or changes for an industry publication, describing why your organization proposes to adopt 1 of them.
Write a 1,225- to 1,575-word article from your organization’s perspective.
Address the following in your article:
•
•
•
•
Review a minimum of 2 recent (within 3 to 5 years) innovations or changes in health care and their impact on existing systems (e.g., firstand second-movers, wearables, printed organs, genetic testing) related to your selected organization within the health care industry.
Align the impact of the innovations/changes with one element of the IHI Quadruple Aim.
Include an analysis explaining how and why the innovations/changes impact the identified IHI Quadruple Aim component.
Describe which innovation/change your organization is proposing to implement and why.
Demonstrate the following within the article:
•
•
•
Graduate-level writing
Graduate-level analysis
Meets standards for publication on a professional social media site
Submit your assignment.
Resources
•
•
•
Center for Writing Excellence
Reference and Citation Generator
Grammar Assistance
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
MHACB/515 Competency 2 Rubric
Page 2 of 2
Competency Assessment Rubric
Assignment/Performance
Criteria
Mastery
100%
Meets Expectations
85%
Not Met
0%
1. Innovations or Changes
(weight 25%)
The article comprehensively
summarized a minimum of 2
recent innovations or changes in
health care and their impact on
existing systems related to the
selected organization within the
health care industry.
The article adequately summarized
2 or fewer than 2 recent innovations
or changes in health care and their
impact on existing systems related
to the selected organization within
the health care industry.
The article did not summarize any
innovations or changes in health
care and their impact on existing
systems related to the selected
organization within the health care
industry.
2. Alignment of Impact
(weight 25%)
The article clearly aligned the
impact of the
innovations/changes with one
element of the IHI Quadruple
Aim.
The article somewhat aligned the
impact of the innovations/changes
with one element of the IHI
Quadruple Aim.
The article did not align the impact of
the innovations/changes with one
element of the IHI Quadruple Aim.
3. Analysis of Impact
(weight 25%)
The article thoroughly analyzed
how and why the
innovations/changes impact the
identified IHI Quadruple Aim
component.
The article sufficiently analyzed how
and why the innovations/changes
impact the identified IHI Quadruple
Aim component.
The article did not analyze how and
why the innovations/changes impact
the identified IHI Quadruple Aim
component.
4. Choice of
Innovation/Change
(weight 20%)
The article thoroughly described
the innovation/change the
organization is proposing to
implement and why.
The article sufficiently described the
innovation/change the organization
is proposing to implement and why.
The article did not describe the
innovation/change the organization
is proposing to implement and why.
5. Grammar and Writing
Mechanics
(weight 5%)
Accuracy in grammar, sentence
structures, sentence boundaries,
and word choice enhanced
content.
Rare inaccuracies/errors in
grammar, sentence structures,
sentence boundaries, and word
choice did not detract from the
content.
Occasional or frequent
inaccuracies/errors in grammar,
sentence structures, sentence
boundaries, and word choice
detracted from the content.
Copyright 2022 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.